Monday, February 1, 2010

Against abortion? You know what to do...

What a funny notion. What if in order to reduce abortion people lobbied for more vasectomies? So I wrote these words after seeing a photo of this bumper. As I sat here trying to dig a blog post out of my skull, I looked at the photo again and decided to visit the website in small print at the bottom of the bumper sticker.

I did it, I visited a pro-life website just to see. I mean really it was more logical than any other pro-life mantra I’ve ever heard. I’m sure vasectomies inhibit a minute number of unintended pregnancies and in turn abortions. It also holds men accountable as a part of reproduction. The debate over choice is fought over women’s bodies, quite literally.

The idea that men who don’t want to have children should get vasectomies is sort of refreshing because it places some of the responsibility on men. I am not pretending to agree with the mission of this bumper sticker or organization. This organization claims to be both pro-choice and anti-abortion, which from my point of view is not possible. There is nothing pro-choice about being against abortion. However, I am intrigued by this organization for a few reasons. Their mission is to reduce abortion through the effective use of contraception, which is definitely a step ahead of those who believe contraception is just as bad as abortion. They also claim to take a moderate stand on abortion, so they at least recognize that there are circumstances when abortion is necessary -- still not in line with my personal beliefs, but not quite as asinine as many anti causes. Really, there is nothing moderate about accepting that women have the right to control their bodies and lives. Finally, they use the money from their bumper sticker to fund vasectomies -- sort of weird, but also sort of productive, right? Snip, snip.

Abortion will never be eliminated even if every single person in the world had access to contraception and used it 100% accurately. Contraception fails, conception can and will happen and sometimes an unwanted pregnancy will need to be terminated. Not to mention that the world is a long, long, long way from every single individual having access to contraceptive technology and information on how to use it properly.

I am not endorsing this cause, just presenting it as a really interesting spin on the pro-life movement. Know thy enemy.


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. I think this is the first step to anti-choicers realizing why they are wrong. It isn't just the woman's fault; a man somewhere put in his part. So why should she have to suffer? At least this group understands that preventing pregnancy with some form of birth control is a step in the right direction. Like you said, a vast improvement over the standard bunch.

  3. Iron Dog, it's so nice to hear a male perspective. Vasectomy rules.

  4. Anti-Anti -- I know a man who at the last minute agreed to have his vasectomy taped (for some kind of instructional video?) and ended up with an entire camera crew between his legs. It was a funny story.

  5. Let's do some math.

    Considering that if a man has sex only once per night -- and if he manages to impregnate a woman each time he has sex -- he has a potential for creating ninety-one pregnancies in nine months!

    And if a woman has sex only once per night, and she creates a pregnancy each time she has sex, she has a potential for creating ONE pregnancy in that same nine months!

    Any questions?


This is not a debate forum -- there are hundreds of other sites for that. This is a safe space for abortion care providers and one that respects the full spectrum of reproductive choices; comments that are not in that spirit will either wind up in the spam filter or languish in the moderation queue.